|
By
Laurie
B. Falconer
The
business market for supporting telephone systems worldwide is worth
more than US $600 billion today, and is growing at about four percent
per year. This market holds tremendous potential in two areas in
particular: traditional telephony services in developing countries,
and data transmission worldwide. As a result of this market situation,
many large carriers today are investing tremendously in data networks.
However, at the same time, even in markets like the United States
and parts of Asia, carriers are struggling to support the growth
in the need for voice lines in addition to those already established.
As
a result, carriers are investigating how they might be able to utilize
data networks to augment, and in some cases replace, current voice
networks. This is considered by many in the industry to be a daunting
task, due to the conflicting network characteristics of traditional
voice networks and data networks. The following chart exemplifies
this phenomenon.
Overcoming
any technical obstacles for utilizing data networks for voice services
is a must for these carriers, however. The benefits for carriers
who achieve this goal are simple, but highly important.
The first major benefit for a carrier utilizing a data network for
voice services is that the carrier only has one network to maintain.
The data network is actually a much more efficient means for transporting
voice traffic, mainly because through compression technology, the
carrier can support many more customers and therefore, calls, at
the same time. With the combination of having just one network to
maintain along with the increased efficiency of transmitting voice
over the data network, the carrier saves money.
The
second major benefit provides the carrier with the opportunity to
increase revenues. The carrier can now offer multiple lines to each
customer over the existing line already in place to the home or
business, and the carrier can charge for the service without the
additional cost of installing additional physical phone lines.
In
addition, the carrier can now support voice, data, possibly video,
and fax services all over the same line, therefore making the most
of the already installed telephone line.
For
the telephone customer, he or she can buy services from the carrier
such as high-speed data and multiple phone lines for far less money
than this type of service would have cost years ago. In fact, with
all things considered, the combined voice and data services are
relatively inexpensive.
The
bottom line is that the carriers are evolving their networks to
support this type of scenario. The new evolved networks feature
high traffic volume growth, high revenue generation, efficient bandwidth
utilization, and high quality of service.
This
sounds like a lot to achieve. But with technical advancements in
the past two years, there are solutions for carriers now that never
existed before. The technology that has been developed to support
the evolved network is known in the industry as Voice over Packet
(VoP).
The way the technology works is fairly straightforward and can be
broken down into four basic steps:
Step
1: Compress the voice traffic according to the quality and cost-savings
specifications of the carrier. This compression takes place within
a piece of equipment called the Integrated Access Device (IAD).
Step
2: Take the compressed Voice and convert it into a data packet
such as Synchronous Transfer Model (ATM) or Internet Protocal (IP)
packets. This is also handled by the IAD equipment.
Step 3: Transmit the voice packets along the phone lines
in a higher section of the frequency spectrum than traditional voice
traffic. A part of the IAD also functions as a modem that sends
the traffic across the line.
Step
4: Receive the packets at the telephone company's office into
a piece of equipment known as a gateway. The gateway also has a
chip in it that uncompresses and converts the packets back to basic
telephone traffic and sends it out across the traditional telephone
network.
There
are many variations of these steps, and of course, the steps are
more complex than they appear to be here. For example, the compression
can be done at a variety of rates. The level of compression the
carrier utilizes, as mentioned above, can vary depending on the
level of service guarantee made to the customer, or the level of
cost savings the carrier wishes to achieve.
In addition, the carrier may wish to mimic the telephony features
that the customer gets with traditional telephone service, such
as voice mail, call waiting, call forwarding, and call screening.
These are functions that the equipment may include, and which are
very important, particularly for the support of business customers.
Also, the IAD and Gateway must also include the flexibility for
the carrier to provide service at the same toll quality customers
get with traditional telephone networks. Early developments of the
VoP technology included issues such as delay and echo. In the early
VoP trials, customers were encountering delay and significant levels
of echo could be heard on the line. This impacts the quality of
the service the customer gets, and therefore impacts the carriers'
ability to get and retain customers.
Another challenge for carriers in converting to the utilization
of a data network for voice is the integration of multiple types
of data networks and how to transmit voice traffic throughout all
the network types. There are basically three types of data networks,
including Frame Relay, Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) and Internet
Protocol (IP). With today's advanced technology, the VOP system
can handle the conversion of voice packets so they can travel between
any of these types of data networks. 
With
the latest generation of chip development, these issues have been
dealt with and can be, for the most part, a thing of the past. What
impacts this is how the carrier chooses to trade off efficiency
with quality. The following chart shows the trade-off:
In
this diagram, there are several keys points shown. First, if efficiency
of the network is to increase, compression will go up. If compression
goes up, quality can go down. Second, with the addition of Voice
Activity Detection (VAD), Silence Suppression (SS), and Comfort
Noise Generation (CNG), small problems may arise with VAD front
end clipping for example. Delay may be introduced if packet optimization
is increased. And finally, the integration of multiple networks
can increase packet overheads.
Despite
the trade-offs, the benefits to the carriers are clear. Not only
can the carrier save costs significantly, but also the carrier can
increase revenues by augmenting its current voice network. The industry
is moving towards the utilization of data networks for voice, and
it is not as daunting as it at first seemed. While carriers today
may not yet find it easy, it is definitely on the fast track to
becoming easy.
|